Illustrative facility view

High-density AI
infrastructure,
engineered from
the grid up.

4AI Factory brings site, power, liquid cooling, compute, fabric, storage, commissioning, and operating readiness into one deployment plan—before long-lead procurement begins.

Illustrative reference scenarioNot operating capacity
128Compute nodes
1,024Accelerator positions
Site-specificPower envelope
Workload-ledFabric topology
Scroll to system

One coordinated deployment plan

Site + powerLiquid-cooledRack-scaleCommissioning-defined

01 / Capabilities

The cluster is only as strong as its dependencies.

We turn capacity and workload requirements into a buildable basis of design, delivery sequence, acceptance criteria, and operating model.

01

Site & Power

Define the feasible power envelope across utility availability, interconnect timing, substation topology, redundancy, and campus load.

Output

Power envelope + site criteria

02

System Architecture

Translate workload and scale into rack, fabric, storage, management, and software-control requirements.

Output

Basis of design + topology

03

Thermal System

Engineer facility water, heat rejection, CDUs, distribution, controls, and service access as one coordinated loop.

Output

Thermal basis + controls

04

Commissioning & Operations

Set integration gates, acceptance tests, observability, spares, and handoff requirements before installation starts.

Output

Acceptance plan + runbooks

02 / System

Architecture starts with constraints, not a parts list.

This scenario shows how compute, fabric, storage, controls, thermal, and facility systems fit together. Final topology, resilience, load, and component choices depend on the site, workload, and supplier availability.

Illustrative reference scenario

Facility + thermal + rack + control layers

128Compute nodes
1,024Accelerator positions
Site-specificPower + thermal
Workload-ledFabric + storage

Illustrative only. Not a customer deployment, validated reference design, availability commitment, or operating capacity.

One production envelope from the utility edge to the operating model.

L0

Site & utility edge

Capacity, topology, resilience, and the interconnect critical path.

L1

Thermal system

Heat rejection, facility water, CDUs, distribution, and controls.

L2

Rack distribution

Electrical and liquid boundaries designed around density and service.

L3

Compute, fabric & storage

A workload-led topology rather than a vendor-led parts list.

L4

Controls & operations

Telemetry, acceptance criteria, runbooks, and expansion triggers.

03 / Risk control

Resolve risk before racks arrive.

The expensive failures happen at system boundaries. We make those boundaries explicit before they become field problems.

01

Power & site

What can the site support—and when?

Resolve feasible load, interconnect timing, redundancy, and mechanical overhead before the hardware plan hardens.

02

Thermal boundary

Can every watt leave the system?

Model facility water, heat rejection, flow, pressure, chemistry, controls, and service conditions as one loop.

03

Dependency path

What actually sets the schedule?

Map long-lead equipment, design decisions, integration gates, substitutions, and site readiness against one critical path.

04

Production acceptance

What does ready mean?

Define test evidence, telemetry, failover behavior, runbooks, spares, and handoff criteria before commissioning begins.

Illustrative maintenance view of a technician inspecting liquid-cooling connections in a GPU rackIllustrative maintenance view

04 / Thermal

Cooling is compute infrastructure.

Direct-to-chip liquid cooling is not an accessory. The complete loop—from facility water and heat rejection through CDUs, manifolds, rack connections, controls, and serviceability—must be engineered together.

01

Temperature, flow, pressure, and chemistry modeled together

02

Resilience aligned to workload and maintenance windows

03

Acceptance evidence from heat rejection to cold plate

05 / Energy

Power defines the deployment envelope.

Utility capacity, interconnect timing, substation topology, and mechanical load determine feasible cluster size and schedule. Resolve that envelope before procurement decisions lock in risk.

Illustrative aerial view of a practical data center campus and electrical substationIllustrative campus view
Energy → thermal → compute

One capacity envelope, validated per site.

06 / Delivery

A gated path to production acceptance.

01

Define

Confirm workload, capacity, site, resilience, economics, and schedule. Record the assumptions driving the design.

OutputAssumptions ledger
02

Engineer

Produce the basis of design across power, thermal, rack, fabric, storage, controls, and operating model.

OutputBasis of design
03

Deliver

Coordinate long-lead items, integration, installation, and test sequencing against defined decision gates.

OutputDependency plan
04

Accept

Commission against agreed criteria and hand off runbooks, observability, and expansion triggers.

OutputAcceptance plan

Deployment brief

Start with four constraints.

Choose scale, system approach, site readiness, and target window. We will assemble a concise scope you can copy, share, and refine.

What this is

A planning artifact—not a quote, schedule commitment, or validated design.

01 / Capacity target
02 / System approach
03 / Site readiness
04 / Target start